Intervening cause is an independent force that occurs after the defendant's act and is also an actual cause of the harm.
Whether or not an intervening cause breaks proximate causation is usually determined using a foreseeability test.
Factors used in determining if an intervening cause breaks the defendant's proximate causation are:
An intervening cause can either be responsive to or independent of the defendant's actions.
A responsive cause is one that occurs in reaction or response to the defendant's prior wrongful conduct.
A responsive intervening cause generally does not relive the initial wrongdoer of criminal responsibility because it is generally foreseeable.
An independent cause is a force that does not occur in response to the initial wrongdoer's actions but does occur because of the situation such action placed the victim in.
An independent cause will usually relieve the original wrongdoer of criminal responsibility of the independent cause's harm unless it was foreseeable.
If the other factors do not make it clear, it is unlikely to be proximate cause, but a few miscellaneous factors can still be considered:
Made by Matthew Miner
Privacy Policy
I am a lawyer, but I am not your lawyer. The content on this site is my understanding of the law and does not constitute legal advice.
I am a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for me to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.